Архив рубрики: News

APPEAL TO PARLIAMENT AND THE PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

ANTINUCLEAR CAMPAIGN
————————————-

Chairman of the Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Zh. Tyakbai

Chairman of the Senate of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan
O. Abdurakimov

Chairman of the Committee on Issues of Ecology and Natural Resource Use Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan
T. Syzdykov

Chairman of the Committee On Issues of Regional Development and Local Government Senate of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan
L. Burlakov

APPEAL

The non-governmental organizations of the Republic of Kazakhstan (KZ) are concerned by the country’s difficult radiation and sanitary-hygienic situation. Against this background, NGOs are particularly concerned by the campaign being conducted by [state nuclear power company] Kazatomprom and a group of deputies in the Mazhilis [lower house] of the Parliament of the RK, aimed at amending the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan with the goal of legalizing the import, storage and burial of radioactive waste from other states on the territory of Kazakhstan. The supporters of importing foreign radioactive waste have been speaking actively in the mass media and propagandizing their idea in government bodies, including within the walls of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan; they possess immeasurably greater resources and opportunities for this than the country’s public, which has spoken decisively against such plans.

In connection with these facts, the non-governmental organizations of Kazakhstan, exercising their rights as guaranteed by the Constitution and legislation of the RK, as well as by international document ratified by the Republic of Kazakhstan, propose that the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan (in accordance with Article 57 of the Constitution of the RK) hold open parliamentary hearings on the issue of the implementation of state policy regarding radiation safety and the initiative for the import, storage, and burial of radioactive waste from other states on the territory of Kazakhstan. The need for hearings by the Parliament of the RK on the given problems is dictated by the issue of guaranteeing the national security of the Republic of Kazakhstan (in accordance with Article 10 of the Law of the RK “On the National Security of the Republic of Kazakhstan”). Non-governmental organizations of Kazakhstan, as well as foreign experts, must be included in such hearings. In the course of the hearings, the public also hopes to receive answers to the following questions:

1. How the Government of the RK is ensuring fulfillment of Article 19, “The Right of Citizens to Radiation Safety,” of Law of the RK No. 219-1, “On the Radiation Safety of the Population,: April 23, 1998, and Articles 13, “Dealing with Radioactive Wastes,” and 15, “Accounting and Control of Nuclear Materials and Other Sources of Ionizing Radiation,” of Law of the RK No. 93-1, “On the Use of Atomic Energy,” April 14, 1997, which concern the issues of liquidating radioactive waste and contamination, and the creation of a cadastre [list] of nuclear materials and sources of ionizing radiation in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

2. What measures have been approved for improving the radiation and sanitary-hygienic situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan, in accordance with Resolution No. 1103 of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, “On Urgent Measures for Improving the Radiation Situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan,” December 31, 1992 (below, the Resolution), and how have they been carried out? How is Point 2 of the Resolution, which states that “The State Committee on the Economy and the Ministry of Finances of the Republic of Kazakhstan, in developing their annual predictions and budget plans, will stipulate the allocation of funds to for targeted financing of environmental work on radioecology,” being fulfilled?

3. How is Part 6, “Radiation Safety of the Population,” of the Republic of Kazakhstan’s National Environmental Action Plan, approved by Resolution No. 878 of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan on June 9, 2000, being carried out?

4. Why do sections 2.5, “Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Use,” and 10, “Ensuring State Security, Strengthening Law and Order, and Fighting Crime,” of the Program of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2002-2004, confirmed by Decree No. 927 of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan on March 28, 2002, not reflect measures to improve the situation in the republic with regard to radiation? At the same time, the section of the plan covering mineral and raw-materials extraction indicated that work will be carried out for “the rational development of existing mines and deposits, as well as ensuring growth in the capacity of enterprises in the nuclear industry, with simultaneous conservation and liquidation of worked-out uranium deposits.”
Legal foundations of our appeal

1. CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN, adopted August 30, 1995 (with amendments from October 7, 1998)

Article 4

1. The provisions of the Constitution, the laws corresponding to it, other regulatory legal acts, international treaty and other commitments of the Republic as well as regulatory resolutions of Constitutional Council and the Supreme Court of the Republic shall be the functioning law in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

2. The Constitution shall have the highest juridical force and direct effect on the entire territory of the Republic.

3. International treaties ratified by the Republic shall have priority over its laws and be directly implemented except in cases when the application of an international treaty shall require the promulgation of a law.

Article 18

3. State bodies, public associations, officials, and the mass media must provide every citizen with the possibility to obtain access to documents, decisions and other sources of information concerning his rights and interests.

Article 20

2. Everyone shall have the right to freely receive and disseminate information by any means not prohibited by law. The list of items constituting state secrets of the Republic of Kazakhstan shall be determined by law.

Article 31

1. The state shall set an objective to protect the environment favorable for the life and health of the person.

2. Officials shall be held accountable for the concealment of facts and circumstances endangering the life and health of the people in accordance with law.

Article 33

1. Citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan shall have the right to participate in the government of the state’s affairs directly and through their representatives, to address personally as well as to direct individual and collective appeals to public and local self-administrative bodies.

Article 57

Each Chamber of the Parliament independently, without participation of the other Chamber shall:

5) hold Parliamentary hearings on the issues of its jurisdiction.
Convention on Access to Information, Participation in Decision-Making, and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
(Aarhus, June 25, 1998)

Article 6

PUBLIC PARTICIPATING IN DECISION ON SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES

4. Each Party shall provide for early public participation, where all options are open and effective public participation can take place.

6. Each Party shall require the competent public authorities to give the public concerned access for examination, upon request where so required under the national law, free of charge and as soon as it becomes available, to all information relevant to the decision-making referred to in this article that is available at the time of the public participation procedure, without prejudice to the right of Parties to refuse to disclose certain information with regard to article 4, paragraphs 3 and 4. The relevant inclusion shall include at least, and without prejudice to the provisions of article 4:

(а) a description of the site and the physical and technical characteristics of the proposed activity, including an estimate of the expected residues and emissions;

(b) a description of the significant effects of the proposed activity on the environment;

(�?) a description of the measured envisaged to prevent and/or reduce these effects, including emissions;

(d) a non-technical summary of the above;

(е) an outline of the main alternatives studied by the applicant; and

(f) in accordance with national legislation, the main reports and advice issued to the public authority and the time when the public concerned shall be informed in accordance with paragraph 2 above.

7. Procedures for public participation shall allow the public to submit, in writing or, as appropriate, at a public hearing or inquiry with the applicant, any comments, information, analyses or opinions that it considers relevant to the proposed activity.

8. Each Party shall insure that in the decision due account in taken of the outcome of the public participation.

Article 7

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION CONCERNING PLANS, PROGRAMMES AND POLICIES RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENT

Each Party shall make appropriate practical and/or other provisions for the public to participate during the preparation of plans and programmes relating to the environment, within a transparent and fair framework, having provided the necessary information to the public. Within this framework, article 6, paragraphs 3, 4 and 8 shall be applied. The public which may participate shall be identified by the relevant public authority, taking into account the objectives of this Convention. To the extent appropriate, each Party shall endeavour to provide opportunities for public participation in the preparation of policies relating to the environment.

Article 8

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DURING THE PREPARATION OF EXECUTIVE REGULATIONS AND/OR GENERALLY APPLICABLE LEGALLY BINDING NORMATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Each Party shall strive to promote effective public participation at an appropriate stage, and while options are still open, during the preparation by public authorities of executive regulations and other generally applicable legally binding rules that may have a significant effect on the environment. To this end, the following steps should be taken:

(а) Time-frames sufficient for effective participation should be fixed;

(b) Draft rules should be published or otherwise made publicly available; and

(�?) The public should be given the opportunity to comment, directly or through representative consultative bodies.

The result of the public participation shall be taken into account as far as possible.

Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 233-1 “On the National Security of the Republic of Kazakhstan,” June 26, 1998
(amended in accordance with Law of the RK No. 45-II on April 28, 2000)

Article 1. The primary concepts employed in the present Law of National Security of the Republic of Kazakhstan (below, “national security”) are:

the state of defense of the country’s national interests against real and potential threats;

the national interests of the Republic of Kazakhstan (below, “national interests”)—the aggregate of political, economic, social and other requirements of the Republic of Kazakhstan, upon the realization of which depends the state’s ability to ensure the defense of constitutional human and civil rights, the values of Kazakhstani society, and the fundamental state institutions;

environmental security—the state of defense of vitally important interests and rights of the individual, society, and state against threats arising as a result of anthropogenic and other impacts on the environment;…

Article 4. National Interests of the Republic of Kazakhstan

The national interests of the Republic of Kazakhstan include the following:

(1) ensuring human and civil rights and freedoms;…

Article 5. Threats to the National Security of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Threats to the national security of the Republic of Kazakhstan include the following:

(9) acute worsening of the environmental situation, natural disasters and other emergency situations of a natural or technogenic nature, epidemics and epizootics;…

Article 10. Authority of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan

The Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan:

(4) conducts parliamentary hearings on questions of ensuring national security;

(5) exercises other authority on questions of ensuring national security, as set forth in the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Article 21. Ensuring Environmental Security

The obligations of the appropriate state bodies, organizations regardless of their form of ownership, officials, and citizens are the following:

(1) protection of the environment and rational use and preservation of natural resources;

(2) refusal to permit the uncontrolled import into Kazakhstan of environmentally hazardous technology, substances, and materials;

(3) prevention of radioactive or chemical pollution, or bacteriological contamination of the country’s territory;

(4) reducing the scale of application of environmental hazardous or unperfected technologies;

(5) liquidation of the negative environmental consequences of economic and other activity.
Law of the RK No. 219-1, “On the Radiation Safety of the Population,” April 23, 1998

Article 19. The Right of Citizens to Radiation Safety

Citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan, foreigners and persons without citizenship, living on the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan, have he right to radiation safety. This right ensures the performance of a set of measures for preventing impact on the human body by ionizing radiation of higher than established norms, as well as radiation safety requirements for persons and organizations engaging in activities involving sources of ionizing radiation.

Article 20. The Right of Citizens and Public Associations and Organizations to the Receipt of Information

Citizens and public associations and organizations have the right to receive information regarding the ensuring of radiation safety through the appropriate state bodies for the use of atomic energy and through the mass media, in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the use of atomic energy.

Law of the Republic of Kazakhstanо No. 93-1, “On the Use of Atomic Energy,” April 14, 1997

Article 3. The Main Principles of State Policy Regarding the Use of Atomic Energy

1. The main principles of state policy regarding the use of atomic energy are as follows:

ensuring nuclear and radiation safety in the use of atomic energy;

accessibility, objectivity, and timeliness of information regarding the impact of objects of atomic energy on the population and environment;

prohibition of the burial of radioactive wastes of other states on the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

ensuring state control and inspection of nuclear and radiation safety in the use of atomic energy;

ensuring the social protection of the personnel of objects for the use of atomic energy, as well as the population living and working in regions where they are located;

restitution of losses caused by the impact of radiation;

participation by citizens, public associations, and other judicial persons in the discussion of state policy? Draft laws, and other normative acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan regarding the use of atomic energy.

Article 21. Rights of Citizens and Public Associations and Organizations Regarding the Use of Atomic Energy

Citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan and public associations and organizations have the right to:

receive information through the appropriate state bodies for the use of atomic energy and through the mass media on the safety of objects for the use of atomic energy designated for construction, planned, under construction, operational, and removed from operation, on the control and inspection of radiation conditions in places where they live or work, and also on the doses of radiation received;

participate in discussions of policy and drafts of legislative acts and programs in the field of atomic energy;

conduct public environmental expertise on draft documents and monitoring of environmental radiation conditions, in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

visit, with the goal of acquainting themselves and according to established procedure, storage and burial sites;

receive restitution for losses and harm as a result of nuclear or radiation accidents at the expense of the exploiting organization permitting the accident to occur;

receive compensation for the negative effects of ionizing radiation on human health, in the event that normative limits for doses of radiation are exceeded, and for additional risk factors, at the expense of the exploiting organization, according to the procedure established by law.
May 23, 2002
Signatures affixed to the appeal of May 23, 2002, on the question of holding parliamentary hearings on the problem of implementing state policy for ensuring radiation safety in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Total of 9 signatures.

Sent to addressees June 19, 2002

————————————————

Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Imangali Nurgalievich Tasmagambetov
APPEAL

Non-governmental organizations of the Republic of Kazakhstan (RK) are concerned by the country’s difficult radiation and sanitary-hygienic situation, and by the campaign by Kazatomprom and a group of deputies in the Mazhilis of the Parliament of the RK to the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, with the goal of legalizing the import, storage and burial of radioactive waste from other states on the territory of Kazakhstan. The public is interested in knowing how state policy regarding radiation safety is being carried out, in accordance with Article Six, “The Authority of State Bodies in Ensuring Radiation Safety,” of Law of the RK No. 219-1, “On the Radiation Safety of the Population,” April 23, 1998. We wish to receive answers to the following questions worrying the public:

1. How the Government of the RK is ensuring fulfillment of Article 19, “The Right of Citizens to Radiation Safety,” of Law of the RK No. 219-1, “On the Radiation Safety of the Population,: April 23, 1998, and Articles 13, “Dealing with Radioactive Wastes,” and 15, “Accounting and Control of Nuclear Materials and Other Sources of Ionizing Radiation,” of Law of the RK No. 93-1, “On the Use of Atomic Energy,” April 14, 1997, which concern the issues of liquidating radioactive waste and contamination, and the creation of a cadastre [list] of nuclear materials and sources of ionizing radiation in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

2. What measures have been approved for improving the radiation and sanitary-hygienic situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan, in accordance with Resolution No. 1103 of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, “On Urgent Measures for Improving the Radiation Situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan,” December 31, 1992 (below, the Resolution), and how have they been carried out?

3. How is Point 2 of the Resolution, which states that “The State Committee on the Economy and the Ministry of Finances of the Republic of Kazakhstan, in developing their annual predictions and budget plans, will stipulate the allocation of funds to for targeted financing of environmental work on radioecology,” being fulfilled?

4. How is Part 6, “Radiation Safety of the Population,” of the Republic of Kazakhstan’s National Environmental Action Plan, approved by Resolution No. 878 of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan on June 9, 2000, being carried out?

5. Why do sections 2.5, “Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Use,” and 10, “Ensuring State Security, Strengthening Law and Order, and Fighting Crime,” of the Program of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2002-2004, confirmed by Decree No. 927 of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan on March 28, 2002, not reflect measures to improve the situation in the republic with regard to radiation? At the same time, the section of the plan covering mineral and raw-materials extraction indicated that work will be carried out for “the rational development of existing mines and deposits, as well as ensuring growth in the capacity of enterprises in the nuclear industry, with simultaneous conservation and liquidation of worked-out uranium deposits.”
The given information touches upon our rights and interests. Our right to the receipt of the indicated information is guaranteed by the following legislation:

1. CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN, adopted August 30, 1995 (with amendments from October 7, 1998)

Article 18

Point 3. State bodies, public associations, officials, and the mass media must provide every citizen with the possibility to obtain access to documents, decisions and other sources of information concerning his rights and interests.

Article 20

Point 2. Everyone shall have the right to freely receive and disseminate information by any means not prohibited by law. The list of items constituting state secrets of the Republic of Kazakhstan shall be determined by law.

Article З1

Point 1. The state shall set an objective to protect the environment favorable for the life and health of the person.

Point 2. Officials shall be held accountable for the concealment of facts and circumstances endangering the life and health of the people in accordance with law.

Article 33

Point 1. Citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan shall have the right to participate in the government of the state’s affairs directly and through their representatives, to address personally as well as to direct individual and collective appeals to public and local self-administrative bodies.

DECREE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN, having the force of law, “On the Procedure for Considering Appeals from Citizens,” June 19, 1995

Article 2. The Concept of Primary Forms of Appeal

In the present Decree, the concept used signifies the following:

5. Inquiry – an appeal expressing the a citizen’s need to receive information on questions of interest, of either a private or a public nature.

CONVENTION ON ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PARTICIPATION IN DECISION-MAKING, AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Article 4. ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION

1. Each Party shall ensure that, subject to the following paragraphs of this article, public authorities, in response to a request for environmental information, make such information available to the public, within the framework of national legislation, including, where requested and subject to subparagraph (b) below, copies of the actual documentation containing or comprising such information:

(а) without an interest having to be stated.

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN “ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION”, July 15, 1997 (with amendments and additions in accordance with Laws of the RK No. 381-1from May 11, 1999; No. 488-1, November 29, 1999; and No. 205-II, June 4, 2001).

Preamble

Nature and its riches are the natural basis for the life and activity of the peoples of the Republic of Kazakhstan, their sustainable socio-economic development, and the increasing of their well-being.

The present Law determines the legal, economic, and social bases for the protection of the environment in the interests of the present and future generations and aimed at guaranteeing environmental security, preventing the harmful impact of economic or other activities on the natural environmental system, preserving biological diversity, and organizing rational use of natural resources.

Article 5. Rights and obligations of citizens in the field of environmental protection.

1. Each citizen and person without citizenship, as well as foreigners located on the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan, has the right to an environment beneficial for life and health, reliable information regarding its state and measures for its improvement, and compensation for harm inflicted on his or her health and property as a consequence of the violation of environmental protection legislation.

Article 6. Rights and obligations of public associations in the field of environmental protection.

1. Public associations, in carrying out their activities in the field of environmental protection, have the right to:

receive from state bodies and organizations timely, full, and reliable information regarding the state of the environment and measures for its improvement…

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN No. 219-1, “ON RADIATION SAFETY”, April 23, 1998

Article 20. The Right of Citizens and Public Associations and Organizations to Receive Information

Citizens and public association and organizations have the right to receive information regarding radiation safety through the appropriate state agencies on the use of atomic energy and though the mass media, in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the use of atomic energy.

May 24, 2002

Signatures affixed to the appeal of May 24, 2002, aimed at the implementation of state policy and state programs regarding radiation safety in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Total of 14 signatures.

Sent to addressees June 19, 2002

Translated by Glenn Kempf
Translated September 24, 2002

HUMAN RIGHTS AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE

ANTINUCLEAR CAMPAIGN
—————————————

Radioactive Money

RAO+The question of the importation and burial of radioactive waste from other countries on the territory of Kazakhstan first attracted the attention of the general public and the national population after the state-run company Kazatomprom “attempted, through a group of parliamentary deputies, to initiate a law on the import of low and mid-level radioactive substances” (Kazakhstanskaya pravda, October 10, 2001).

The need to amend existing legislation was based on the possibility “of using extra-budgetary sources to finance a series of measures for normalizing the situation with regard to radiation,” which, in turn, would lead to “an improvement in socioeconomic conditions” in the country.

From 1991 through 1997, despite the fact that Kazakhstan’s economic situation was worse than now, the question of obtaining money by such means was never raised on an official level. In 1992, the resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers “On Urgent Measures to Improve Radiation Conditions in the Republic of Kazakhstan” (no. 1103, December 31, 1992) was issued, which stated, “The State Committee on the Economy and the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan, in developing their annual forecasting and budget plans, shall stipulate the allocation of full financing for environmental protection work concerning radio-ecology.”

In 1997, the laws “On the Use of Atomic Energy” and “On Environmental Protection” were adopted, which prohibited the import of radioactive waste from foreign countries (Article 3, point 1, and Article 57, respectively). The law “On Environmental Protection” largely repeated Article 42 of the 1991 “Law on Environmental Protection in the Kazakh SSR.”

At the present time, when the economy is improving (“On the State of the Nation…”) and long-awaited revenues from the extraction of oil have begun to arrive, the position of Kazakhstan’s ruling circles regarding the import and storage of radioactive waste from other countries on the territory of Kazakhstan has completely reversed itself. In order to solve the nation’s problems, whose severity was already recognized at the beginning of the 1990s, the government suddenly and urgently requires money, which, in the opinion of some parliamentary deputies and the leadership of Kazatomprom, must be earned at any cost. Is this not evidence that the government’s 1992 resolution and other, earlier legal acts, are simply not being fulfilled? As a result, new doubts arise: will the money obtained from the import and storage of radioactive waste from foreign countries in fact be used to improve radioactive conditions in Kazakhstan?

Environmental and Economic Policy

What on earth can explain such frequent shifts in direction?

In the last ten years, no environmental policy confirmed by Parliament has been developed in Kazakhstan. At the same time, the economic policy pursued—one increasingly aimed at various means of exploiting the country’s natural resources—has exacerbated, and will continue to exacerbate, the distortions in Kazakhstan’s economic development. Therefore, the government’s changed opinion with regard to the problem of importing and storing radioactive waste from other countries on Kazakhstan’s territory, as with a number of other important environmental problems, is explained by the immediate interests of specific ministries, agencies, and commercial structures.

However, one “unexpected” obstacle on the path to unlimited exploitation of natural resources has proven to be…national legislation. In order to overcome this obstacle, various ministries, agencies, commercial structures, and transnational corporations have begun to put pressure on legislators with the goal of adapting the law to meet their immediate needs.

It is for these reasons that the 1997 law “On the Environment” was amended four times, and now has been proposed for amending a fifth time. The removal of “uncomfortable” statements from environmental legislation is no exception; other laws have been changed in a similar fashion. This negative tendency was noted by the Constitutional Council in its address to Parliament on March 16, 2001, in which it stated that “…legislation is not always developed systematically…,” “…the stability of the law is not guaranteed successfully.” “Many problems have accumulated with regard to the quality of laws: contradiction of norms, frequent and unjustified amendments…” (p. 9).

As a result of the amendments introduced into environmental legislation over the past four years, the economic mechanism for the rational use of natural resources and protection of the environment created in the first years of independence has been destroyed:

— The Fund for the Protection of Nature has been liquidated, which confirms once again the corrected of the World Bank’s conclusions that the effectiveness of the work of environmental funds “depends on capable administration of the funds and opportunities for state regulation of legal enforcement” (“Draft…,” point 121);

— The new Tax Code legalizes accelerated amortization for resource-extracting industries, creating a hidden form of subsidies for commercial companies, and above all for the oil industry (Article 110), and effectively stimulating the exploitation of natural resources; previously, in accordance with the 1991 “Law of the Kazakh SSR on Protection of the Natural Environment in the Kazakh SSR” (Article 32), accelerated amortization was used to stimulate environmental protection activities, but this article was removed from the 197 law “On Environmental Protection”;

— Payments for the protection and restoration of natural resources were not included in the new Tax Code (Article 62);

— The question of repairing environmental damage inflicted by previous activity failed to receive due clarification in the 1997 law “On Environmental Protection” (Article 51, point 3);

— The role of public environmental expert analysis was effectively reduced to zero in 1997; according to the law “On Environmental Protection” passed in that year, “the conclusions of expert analysis are intended to provide information and recommendations”;

— “Unclear ownership rights,” including the right to ownership of natural resources, have thus far presented a serious obstacle on the path to the formation of a market economy. This fact is noted in the World Bank’s draft environmental strategy for Europe and Central Asia. In particular, the Bank’s draft states that “increased ‘transparency’ of the legal and regulatory base, particularly with regard to changes in property rights, the price of natural resources, export-import licenses, waiving of fines for pollution, and so forth” (point 65).

All of the amendments list above, as well as unsatisfactory observance of the law, have led to a redistribution of monetary flows, which explains the lack of funds needed to finance environmental protection activities. It has been proposed that this “deficit” be compensated using the planned revenues obtained from the import, storage, and burial of radioactive waste. Our republic’s natural environment and resources have become small change in the battle to compete on the international markets, one of the ways to attract foreign investment. The concept of “environmental policy” has been erased from Kazakhstan’s political lexicon.

Such deliberate destruction of the economic mechanism for the rational use of natural resources and protection of the environment clearly demonstrates how a one-sided focus on economic priorities, without taking into account their interrelationship with environmental ones, engenders new and even more difficult problems.

Dubious Priorities

In describing their future plans for the country’s development, the ruling elite has staked their hopes on Kazakhstan’s rich natural resources, although it would be more correct to speak of the country’s rich mineral resources. Not a single sensible-minded politician can be found who would not admit that Kazakhstan faces a plethora of severe environmental problems: soil degradation, insufficient water resources, chemical pollution, desertification, and others. The national leadership’s decision to count on Kazakhstan’s rich natural resources as a means for economic development has thus long raised doubts among specialists.

In the opinion of experts from the World Bank: “Despite Kazakhstan’s wealth of natural resources, environmental problems may limit the country’s existing potential for economic growth” (Kazakhstan: Priority Directions…, p. iii). “Even such resource-rich countries as Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan may become the victims of instability, which will arise if revenues from the use of those resources are not directed toward social development,” United Nations Development Program researchers assert (Verkhailen et al., p. 8).

It would seem as though such critical evaluations should be taken into account, and the fact that even the environmental space of the ninth largest country in the world is not unlimited should be seriously considered. An environment beneficial for life has become an increasing rarity in our republic, shrinking like wet leather. Alas, however, no attention is paid to the critics, and we have become witnesses to a new and more refined approach to land use in Kazakhstan: the development of a plan for burying foreign waste on its territory. Are there really no “better” places on earth for burying foreign radioactive waste than in Kazakhstan!?

Human Rights

Finally, human rights are no longer an obstacle to the adoption of such fateful decisions. Many parliamentary deputies, members of government, officials, entrepreneurs, and specialists, as before, consider socioeconomic and environmental problems without paying attention to human rights. At the same time, the acknowledgement, observance, and defense of human rights are a necessary condition for the development of democracy.

The international legal aspect of the problem does not bother our leaders either. The “softening” of laws and the “removal of formal limitations existing in current legislation” proposed by a group of deputies mean that Kazakhstan’s acceptance of international obligations in the sphere of human rights in no more than a formality. The 8th, 11th, 14th, and 15th principles of the Rio Declaration, which call, in particular, for states to pass effective legislation with regard to the environment and implement broad measures for its protection, are ignored. The fact that all of this is occurring at the same time as Kazakhstan’s preparations to take part in the UN’s “Rio 92+10” conference on sustainable development (Johannesburg, 2002) is highly significant.

On October 23, 2000, Kazakhstan ratified the Aarhus Convention on access to information, participation by the public in decision-making, and access to legal proceedings on environmental questions. Joining this convention further obligates the country’s leadership to decide whether or not to import and store foreign radioactive waste only with the wide participation of the public in the process. At the same time, the population and public should receive all information needed “for making decisions” in a form “useful for decision-making” (Agenda 21, Article 40). Any other method of decision-making violates Articles 6 and 7 of the Aarhus Convention and Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration, which states that “environmental issues are best handled with participation of all concerned citizens…”

Finally, it must not be forgotten that Kazakhstan signed the Charter for European Security, adopted by the OSCE in Istanbul in 1999. In doing so, Kazakhstan took upon itself the obligation “to counter such threats to security as violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms…” (Article 19).

At a Crossroads — Again

Discussion of plans for the import, storage, and burial of radioactive waste on the territory of Kazakhstan once more demonstrates the conflict between the supporters of two contrasting models for the republic’s socioeconomic development.

The first model can be defined as “market extremism.” Its essence lies in the following characteristics:

— an orientation toward short-term economic benefits;

— an economy aimed at obtaining profit at any cost (through the import and storage of foreign radioactive waste, for instance);

— the use of natural riches as bargaining chips in the competitive battle for the international market (for example, Kazakhstan possesses a large territory, on which foreign radioactive waste can be safely buried);

— disregard for human rights, observance of the law, international obligations, and the country’s international prestige (for example, national legislation is “a formal limitation,” and no more than that).

The second model is aimed at the creation of a law-guided state, based on observance of human rights and legality, fulfillment of international obligations, and use of the market mechanism to achieve sustainable development.

Officially, our republic has proclaimed its devotion to the idea of a state guided by the law. In fact, however, a battle is underway between the supporters of the two aforementioned models for development.

On October 19-20, 2001, a conference entitled “The Import and Burial of Radioactive Waste in the Republic of Kazakhstan: A Dialogue Between Government and Civil Society” took place in Almaty. The conference was organized by the OSCE, the state nuclear power company Kazatomprom, and the Tabighat (Nature) Ecological Union.

The conference participants unanimously acknowledged that Kazakhstan has enough money for the burial of its own radioactive waste. However, neither Parliament, nor the government, nor Kazatomprom can control the monetary flows — a fact that, incidentally, is a secret to no one. Government officials present at the conference listed corruption, the shadow economy, and the flawed tax system as reasons for the current situation. Rather than take radical measures to solve the problem, however, they proposed earning money another way. Easier to import waste than remove corruption! The acknowledgement of this fact was the main result of the conference.

The high level of corruption in Kazakhstan is confirmed by the research of the international organization Transparency International, carried out the start of 2001. As a result of Transparency International’s study, a list of 91 countries was compiled. Countries appearing on the list were ranked according to an “index of perception of corruption.” The first three places were occupied by Finland, Denmark, and New Zealand, possessing minimal corruption. Kazakhstan shared the 71st slot with India, Honduras, and Uzbekistan (“Transparency Kazakhstan Presents…”). In addition, in the course of the research it was established that the higher the level of corruption within a country, the more significant the level of pollution and environmental destruction there (Panorama, February 9, 20001).

Thus, a discussion of the question of importing and burying radioactive waste clearly shows that this issue, which at first glance may seem a private one, is in fact connected to an entire series of crucial and unresolved political, socioeconomic, and environmental problems of our republic. Efforts by government officials to present the problem as a purely technical one, and to solve it by means of “insignificant” changes to existing legislation, are only one more proof of the failure to respect the people’s right to live in a beneficial environment, and their right of access to natural resources, information, and the making of environmentally significant decisions in Kazakhstan.

* * *

References (in Russian):

Verkhaien, T., Sirotkin, S., and Kozakov, A., “Democracy’s Offspring in Conflict with Soviet Heritage and Local Traditions”, State Administration in Transitional Economies, June 2001, pp. 1-17.

Kazakhstan: Priority Directions for Development and a Proposed Propgram for Action, Dept. for Central Asian Countries, World Bank, 2001.

“‘On the State of the Nation and the Main Directions of Domestic and Foreign Policy in 2002’: Annual Address of the President of the Republic to the People of Kazakhstan”, Kazakhstanskaya pravda, Sept. 4, 2001.

Address of the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On the State of Constitutional Legality in the Republic”, Astana, 2001.

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Kazakhstan no. 1103, “On Urgent Measures for Improving Radiation Conditions in the Republic of Kazakhstan”, December 31, 1992.

“Draft Environmental Strategy of the World Bank for the Region of Europe and Central Asia”, Aug. 15, 2000.

“Transparency Kazakhstan Presents the Index of Perception of Corruption for 2001”, For a Society Without Corruption, no. 1 (6), pp. 4-7.

Sergei Kuratov
Ecological Society Green Salvation

December 22, 2001

Translated from the Russian by Glenn Kempf